Last updated: October 27th, 2023

The main goal is to promote NAUTILUS and its results as far as and as effectively as possible to all relevant stakeholders and to identify key exploitable results towards the further marketability and emission reduction in maritime transport, mainly in cruise ships.

8.1 WP Leader

• GRANT Garant (GG)

8.2 Tasks and Outputs

Webpage, social media interaction, PR messages & videos

• At the beginning of the project, main communication tools were distributed among partners, website and profile at Twitter/X, LinkedIn and YouTube were created.
• Deliverable D8.1 – PR kit – completed

Workshops and stakeholders’ engagement activities

• Recognizing the importance of disseminating information to the appropriate stakeholder audience, two workshops were planned to showcase the project's achievements and highlight its benefits.

Figure 1: Workshop: Potential and challenges of innovative power systems and synthetic fuels for emission reduction in waterborne transport

• The first workshop took place in June 2022 in Lucerne, Switzerland. It focused on the potential and challenges of innovative power systems and synthetic fuels for emission reduction in waterborne transport. A summary
• NAUTILUS was presented at the Transport Research Area in Dublin, Ireland, in April 2024. The project was represented at the stand hosted by the Waterborne Technology Platform, and a poster was presented. A summary article is available here

Figure 2: NAUTILUS at Transport Research Area, Dublin, Ireland.

• The second event organised alongside to the well-established conference European Fuel Cell Forum were the Sustainable Shipping Days that took part at 1^st-2^nd July 2024 in Lucerne, in Switzerland. The SSD conference concept is to explore and promote advancements in maritime sustainability by integrating of fuel cell-based onboard energy systems and electrolysis technology at ports for fuel supply. A summary article is available here.

Figure 3: NAUTILUS at Transport Research Area, Dublin, Ireland.

• Deliverable D8.3 – Plan for Exploitation and Dissemination of Research IPR strategy – completed
• Deliverable D8.4 – Workbook for public workshop – completed
  

IP and positioning development

• An IPR manager assures IPR strategy and negotiations with Intellectual property offices.
• Deliverable D8.2 – IPR strategy – completed

Exploitation strategy and support to the technology transfer

• The goal of this task is to support the patenting and pre-patenting efforts of the industrial partners.
• Deliverable D8.5 – Exploitation and technology transfer – pending.

8.3 Duration and Status

• Months 1 - 54
• Status – in progress

⇒ DOWNLOAD (PDF)

Last updated: July 29, 2024

Work package dedicated to the management of project duties and requirement, to lead and coordinate the consortium, to ensure that the decision enabling process is applied, to facilitate and chair project meetings and WP1 leader acts as the communicative interface between the EC and the consortium.

1.1 WP Leader

Deutsches Zentrum für Luft – und Raumfahrt/German Aerospace Center (DLR)

1.2 Tasks and Outputs

General project coordination

• This task covers control and monitoring of administrative and financial issues.
• Deliverable D1.1 - Consortium Agreement - completed

Day-to-day project level management

• Ensures implementation of all WPs by planning, co-ordination and control of WP tasks.

Figure 1: Project meeting, Lucerne, Switzerland, July 2024

Figure 2: Project meetings, Brussels, Belgium, December 2022, September 2023, March 2024

Figure 3: Project meeting, Lucerne, Switzerland, July 2022

• Deliverable D1.2 - Project Management Plan - completed

Quality assurance and risk management

• Risk assessments accompanied by the identification of mitigation measures is the core of this task.

Resource coordination

• This task defines key elements of management, decision-making and control structure during implementation of project activities.

Data management plan implementation (DMP)

• The DMP provides a clear structure, how the data will be managed and accessible for all consortium members.
• Deliverable D1.3 - Data Management Plan - completed

1.3 Duration and Status

• Months 1 - 54
• Status – in progress

⇒ DOWNLOAD (PDF)

Last updated: July 29, 2024

This work package is dedicated to a technology impact analysis of the genset developed in the project. The objectives of this WP are the determination of the Genset performance using future renewable fuels for green transport, techno-economic analysis of the genset, emission analysis of the proposed genset and perform its life-cycle analysis.

7.1 WP Leader

• Technische Universiteit Delft (TUD)

7.2 Tasks and Outputs

Future fuels analysis and deployment

• The performance of the genset was evaluated for future fuels that are of interest to the marine sector. The production capacity, the volumetric and gravimetric energy density of onboard storage, technology maturity, safety, fuel cost, storage cost, and environmental impact were the criteria that the future fuels were evaluated against. LNG, methanol, (renewable) diesel, ammonia, and hydrogen were eventually shortlisted.
• The electric power and heat delivered by the SOFC system as well as its efficiency depend on the type of fuel used. A suitable system layout was designed for all five shortlisted fuels and thermodynamically modeled to estimate the electrical and thermal efficiency and the power delivered by the SOFC. The results in Figure 1 show that the use of ammonia results in the highest total efficiency for combined power and heat production.

Figure 1: Results of thermodynamic analysis of SOFC systems for five different fuels

• Deliverable D7.2 - Genset performance report with future fuels – completed

Techno-economic analysis

• The results of the analysis of the genset performance with alternative fuels were subsequently used to evaluate whether these fuels could offer an economically competitive solution. Therefore, a technical economic analysis (TEA) was performed together with a cost-benefit analysis.
• The data from the thermodynamic analysis were combined with cost data of the SOFC system and the different fuels for a techno-economic analysis, considering the capital cost of the different SOFC components, cost of stack replacement, fuel cost and maintenance cost.
• Cathode off-gas recirculation reduces the levelized cost of exergy (LCOEx) for all fuels as well. An additional sensitivity analysis suggested that fuel purchase cost, stack lifetime, and annual interest rate are the three parameters with the highest influence on the system cost.

Figure 2: Results of techno-economic analysis of SOFC systems for five different fuels and without (left) and with (right) cathode off-gas recirculation.

• Deliverable D7.3 - Techno-economic analysis and cost prediction report of genset – completed.

Life cycle analysis (LCA)

• The main objective of this task was to carry out an initial life cycle analysis (LCA) of maritime SOFC power plants for methane and the four alternative fuels selected in the future fuel analysis, namely methanol, diesel, ammonia, and hydrogen.
• The impacts from fuel production were combined with the energy content and the SOFC system efficiencies to quantify the life cycle performance of each fuel and compare it to benchmark systems based on diesel and internal combustion engines.
• A 99% reduction in acidification, eutrophication (marine and terrestrial) and photochemical ozone formation is possible for almost all SOFC fuels compared to ICE diesel (NO_X tier II) and ICE HFO.

Figure 3: Comparison of fuel GWP per MJ energy content (LHV) including production and use (source: ecoinvent 3.9.1, Hydrogen Tools, Mehmeti et. al (2018) and Morgan (2013).

• Deliverable D7.1 - Screening LCA report of the genset – completed.
• Deliverable D7.4 - Full LCA report on the hybrid genset and integration with cruise ships – completed.

Emission analysis

• A detailed emission analysis is performed in this task to quantify the emissions from the genset compared to the emissions from current state-of-the-art marine ICEs. A literature review of ship emissions of relevance for adverse health impact focused on emission factors of air pollutants regulated in emission and air quality legislation.
• The review defined a base case using air pollutants between the traditional use of heavy fuel oil (HFO) in internal combustion engines (ICE), a case using liquified natural gas (LNG) in ICEs, and the SOFC genset run on LNG.
• Emission measurements will be conducted over three test weeks at DLR. These tests are optimally scheduled for the first three weeks of October and the testing phases include 1-2 weeks of static and dynamic tests, followed by 1-2 weeks of real profile tests.

   

Figure 4: Weatherproof box for exhaust extraction

• Emission measurements at the demonstrator will utilize a range of instruments, including a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer or Condensation Particle Counter for particle size distribution and number concentration, an Optical Particle Counter for PM₅ mass concentration, and an Aethalometer for black carbon concentration. Gas components will be analyzed using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), alongside dedicated NO_X and SO₂ analyzers.

Figure 5: Emission measurements at the Demonstrator

• Deliverable D7.5 - Emission analysis report of the genset – ongoing.

Health Impact Assessment (HIA)

• The NAUTILUS project studies the toxicological effects of shipping emissions on human health. Dose-dependent toxicological studies on human tissue exposed to these emissions are necessary for accurate health impact assessments and comprehensive risk evaluations. Within the project, such studies on human tissue reactions to emission exposure were conducted in two areas exposed to air pollution from maritime transport (Hamburg and Trelleborg), with the potential extension to other locations for inclusion in health impact assessments (HIA) being considered.

Figure 6: Toxicological effects of shipping emissions

7.3 Duration and Status

• Months 1 - 54
• Status – work in progress

 7.4 WP7 Highlights

• The performance of the genset was evaluated for future fuels that are of interest for the marine sector. A suitable system layout was designed for all five shortlisted fuels and thermodynamically modeled to estimate the electrical and thermal efficiency and the power delivered by the SOFC (D7.2).
• The techno-economic analysis of maritime SOFC power plants for methane and four alternative fuels, namely methanol, diesel, ammonia, and hydrogen was completed. From the analysis, it was concluded that SOFCs using either methanol or diesel are close to the economic parity compared to a diesel-ICE baseline (D7.3).
• A screening life cycle analysis (LCA) was completed for SOFCs. Methane and four alternative fuels, namely methanol, diesel, ammonia, and hydrogen, were assessed using the performance of the genset as reported in D7.2, focusing on global warming potential during the operational phase of the genset.
• A full LCA of the hybrid genset and integration with cruise ships was completed, comparing the environmental performance of the SOFC genset with various fuels to benchmark systems based on internal combustion engines with HFO, diesel (Tier II and III) and LNG (D7.4).
• The emission analysis task started out with a literature review of ship emissions of relevance for adverse health impact (SO₂, NO_X, PM, BC, ...). This data was used for a preliminary Health Impact Assessment (HIA) of population mortality for the south Sweden region and Hamburg area. A measurement set-up including an FTIR instrument and state-of-the-art PM characterization techniques for SOFC emission measurements has been designed and tested for SOFC-like exhaust conditions at SolydEra SPA (SE_SPA).
• The analysis of the experimental emission tests at SolydEra SPA (SE_SPA) was finalized, as well as the design interface between the demonstrator and emission measurement set-up.

7.5 Next steps

• A final HIA will be performed at M50 based on the real experimental validation of air pollutant emission factors at the NAUTILUS SOFC demonstrator by Lund University (ULUND)
• Analysis of the emission measurements carried at the demonstrator by Lund University (ULUND).

⇒ DOWNLOAD (PDF)

Last updated: October 23th, 2024